Comparison
Synapse vs. traditional counter-UAS systems
Most airspace awareness technology today is genuinely capable, but built for a different customer. If you're a defense program integrating sensors across a military operation, one of those systems is a reasonable starting point. If you're a security director responsible for the airspace over a single critical-infrastructure site, Synapse is built for exactly that job.
Where they differ
| Synapse | Traditional / military-grade systems | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Critical infrastructure security teams | Military and defense operations |
| Procurement path | Direct pilot, weeks not quarters | Defense procurement cycle |
| Deployment footprint | Site-scoped, no classified infrastructure required | Program-scale, classified-capable architecture |
| Who it's sized for | A security team, not a program office | A defense contractor or government program |
| Pricing model | Directional — see Pricing | Enterprise/government contract |
Not sure which category fits your site?
Take the self-assessment — it's built to help you figure that out, not to sell you anything.